Getting climate, energy & environment news right.

Conservatives have been vocal about our climate for years. Those voices won’t be ignored any longer.

[searchandfilter id="17558"]
  • Zinc-based batteries are poised for wider deployment as energy storage demand surges and potential lithium shortages loom over the next few years, officials with the International Zinc Association told Utility Dive this week.
  • U.S. zinc battery production is hindered by the high cost of scaling production and safety standards written for far more flammable lithium-ion batteries, according to a June 30 white paper coauthored by Josef Daniel-Ivad, head of the IZA’s Zinc Battery Initiative. Andrew Green, the IZA’s executive director, said in an interview that more work needs to be done to increase awareness of and comfort with zinc batteries among utilities and other end users.

Read more in Utility Dive here.

s an electric grid operator warns of potential power shortages amid this week’s heat wave, the Trump administration is issuing emergency orders aiming to maximize output.

Energy Secretary Chris Wright issued orders directing grid operator PJM to dispatch more power generation from various fossil fuel plants, as needed, despite environmental restrictions that are typically in place.

Read more in The Hill here.

Americans are exhausted by the cost of living—and energy sits at the heart of it. Recently published research by Kevin Dayaratna and Kat Miller at Advancing American Freedom (AAF) analyzing worldwide data finds that robust energy production is directly tied to higher incomes, greater productivity, longer life expectancy, and lower child mortality. The reality is stark: no country has ever achieved high living standards without substantial energy use. 

The economy or the climate? Why not both?

Subscribe for ideas that support the environment and the people. 

Yet America’s regulatory regime makes energy harder, not easier, to produce—and families pay the price. Last year, federal regulation cost the U.S. economy an estimated $2 trillion—approximately $25,000 for a family of four. 

Indeed, onerous regulations on things as simple as food ingredients and food packaging have pushed grocery prices higher, and that regulations on health insurance plans have fueled the rise in health care costs. When the government inserts itself into every corner of American life, the cost to ordinary Americans is real and impacts their pocketbooks. 

It comes as no surprise that cost of living is the number one problem facing American families. Voters know what they’re experiencing and it’s real. Now, elected officials must respond accordingly. 

Upon retaking office, the Trump Administration launched a 10-to-1 deregulation initiative  and during its first year slashed Federal Register output (the official publication of new federal regulations) to its lowest level in over 30 years, reducing the regulatory burden on American families.  But Congress must do its part as well. 

Congress should pursue aggressive and commonsense permitting reform to drive down regulatory costs and relieve hardworking American families from the suffocating burden of government regulations. If regulatory burdens are driving the financial pressure Americans face, then robust policy that cuts red tape and streamlines permitting is a direct step toward relief. A broken permitting system is a not-so-hidden tax that every American pays every single day, buried in clear sight on their energy bills, their internet costs, and the price of American-made goods.  

As AAF’s research makes clear, energy abundance is the engine of the prosperity Americans want. America’s regulatory regime should reflect that simple truth and make it easier, not harder, to get electric capacity operational. 

>>>READ: How the SPEED Act Seizes the Moment on Permitting Reform

With the explosive growth of AI and emerging technologies, energy demand is sharply rising, and America needs to meet the moment with more domestic energy production. Yet the average permitting timelines for major energy projects stretch between four and seven years, with costs climbing every year due to inflation and unnecessary red tape. These permitting handcuffs risk forfeiting America’s AI and tech advantage to China. Every year of delay is another year that new capacity sits offline; energy prices stay elevated, and America loses ground in the battle for AI supremacy. Streamlining that process would lower building costs and expand American energy capacity when the country needs it most. 

The same story plays out across the broader economy. Regulatory compliance costs small manufacturers approximately $29,000 per employee per year and industrial projects take roughly 80 percent longer to permit in the United States than in other countries. Meanwhile, broadband and wireless projects are stalled by duplicative permits, unpredictable timelines, and excessive fees, leaving rural communities without the internet access that the 21st century economy—from education to healthcare to economic opportunity—increasingly requires. Regulatory bottleneck isn’t protecting Americans; it is burdening them.

Indeed, regulation sold as “protection” is, in practice, an unnecessary cost driver, passed quietly from government to business to the average consumer.

Permitting reform is the clear, actionable response to overregulation. After years of partisan stalemate, permitting reform has emerged as a genuine bipartisan opportunity. New polling shows that voters across the political spectrum support permitting reform and Congress has recently taken notice. 

>>>READ: How to Build Breakthroughs in America Without Subsidies

The House passed the SPEED Act and the PERMIT Act in December, and Senate negotiations are ongoing. But with the midterms approaching and electoral uncertainty waiting in the wings, Congress must act now to free the American people from a suffocating regulatory regime.

Republicans have an obligation to make good on their promise to make America more affordable. Overregulation is not an abstract policy problem; it is the reason families are paying more for groceries, healthcare, and energy. Permitting reform is action that can solve this lingering issue. Americans sent their representatives to Washington to lower bills, make groceries more affordable, and spur job growth. Cutting the red tape that drives up their costs is the most direct answer Congress has. 

The moment is here, and it will not wait. 

As Western governments seek to reduce dependence on Chinese rare earth supply chains, Brazil is emerging as one of the world’s most promising new sources of critical minerals.

The country holds the world’s second-largest rare earth resource base and is home to a growing number of advanced ionic clay projects. At the same time, the recent G7 declaration on critical minerals has reinforced the strategic importance of developing new mining, processing and recycling capacity among trusted partners.

Read more in Power Technology here.

When Dominion Energy first announced the Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind (CVOW) commercial project in September 2019, the proposal was striking. At the time, the U.S. offshore wind market was still fairly nascent, though federal and state permitting activity, lease auctions, and offtake agreements were beginning to advance projects in Rhode Island, Massachusetts, and New York. Rather than proposing the unusually large project through a state procurement or by partnering with an independent developer under a power purchase agreement, Dominion proposed to self-develop, own, and operate 2.6 GW as a regulated, rate-based utility asset. But at that point, no commercial-scale offshore wind project had been built in U.S. federal waters, no U.S.-flagged, Jones Act–compliant installation vessel existed for turbine installation at that scale, and offshore wind was generally viewed as too expensive to justify at utility scale without direct state procurement support.

Dominion’s proposal leaned on a federal lease the company had held since November 2013, when Virginia Electric and Power Co.—doing business as Dominion Virginia Power—submitted the winning bid at the second competitive renewable energy lease sale ever held on the Outer Continental Shelf to secure 112,800 acres about 27 miles off Virginia Beach. As it formally unveiled CVOW, Dominion filed an interconnection request with PJM and outlined a three-phase buildout of roughly 880 MW per phase at a preliminary capital cost estimate of $8 billion.

Read more in Power Magazine here.

The Trump administration announced Wednesday that three advanced nuclear reactors built by U.S. companies had reached key operational milestones, meeting its July 4 goal to advance the nascent technology it hopes will revolutionize the power sector.

A reactor from Houston-based Deployable Energy became the third during Trump’s term to reach criticality, in which it produces a stable nuclear chain reaction, as part of a program sponsored by the Energy Department. The administration’s focus on deploying smaller nuclear technologies comes as U.S. energy demand is soaring, driven in part by the rise of power-hungry data centers.

Read more in Politico here.

Drew Bond wrote a letter to the Wall Street Journal on the red tape and poor tax credits hindering the solar industry.

Rahm Emanuel rightly identifies America’s dependence on Chinese solar as a policy failure in his op-ed “On Energy, Democrats Can Learn From Texas” (June 16), but he misattributes the cause. The U.S. didn’t lose solar manufacturing because Republicans prioritized oil and gas. We lost because China deployed over $50 billion in state subsidies while American policymakers buried an industry the U.S. pioneered with overbearing environmental regulations and a tax credit structure that rewarded capital spending over operational efficiency. Those conditions developed across administrations of both parties, including the one in which Mr. Emanuel served as chief of staff.

The good news is that much of Mr. Emanuel’s prescription—geothermal, small modular reactors, permitting reform, supply-chain investment—is correct. Texas figured this out years ago, building the nation’s most resilient and affordable grid through market incentives and an all-of-the-above approach. Alongside fossil fuels, a Republican state continues to lead the nation in renewable energy generation because voters ultimately don’t care where their energy comes from as long as it is abundant and cheap. The rest of the country would benefit from following the Texas model.

Two months after the Trump administration canceled two large offshore wind energy leases, the US Department of the Interior (DOI) announced a settlement with Duke Energy.


The agreement, announced Monday by Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, allows Duke Energy, the state’s largest electrical producer and provider, to voluntarily terminate its federal offshore wind lease for its Carolina Long Bay project. The Carolina Long Bay project was planned around 22 miles south of Bald Head Island in Brunswick County and was expected to generate enough electricity to power more than 300,000 homes. 

Read more in The Carolina Journal here.

Extreme heat is putting increasing pressure on Europe’s electricity grids as rising temperatures increase the need for air conditioning in homes, offices and businesses, driving up electricity demand, tightening power markets and, in some cases, reducing electricity supply.

Although air-conditioning remains far less common in Europe than in many other parts of the world, ownership is rising as heatwaves become more frequent. Around 20% of households have air conditioning, according to the International Energy Agency, and that share is expected to grow as the continent warms.

Read more in Euronews here.

Farmers today are producing food under pressures that would have been unimaginable to previous generations. Input costs are rising and supply chains are unreliable. Water is scarcer. Weather is less predictable. And for a growing number of farmers — in Sudan, in Ukraine, in Myanmar, in Gaza — the challenge is producing food at all, in the middle of active conflict. These are not marginal conditions. They describe the reality facing hundreds of millions of people who grow the food the world depends on.

Smart farming — using data, digital tools and precision technologies to make better decisions, use fewer inputs, and get more from every hectare — is not a luxury response to these pressures. It is increasingly a practical and necessary one. It helps farmers know when to plant, where fertilizer will generate the greatest return, how much water a crop actually needs, where pests are likely to emerge, and which risks are developing before they become crises. 

Read more in AgriPulse here.

Subscribe to our exclusive email designed for conservatives who care about climate.

Help us promote free market solutions for climate change.

5 Incredible Ways Economic Freedom Helps the Planet.

Sign up for our newsletter now to get the full list right in your inbox.

Thank you for signing up

Help us promote sensible solutions for both planet and prosperity.

Download Now