Getting climate, energy & environment news right.

Conservatives have been vocal about our climate for years. Those voices won’t be ignored any longer.

[searchandfilter id="17558"]

A small Wisconsin city upended by a data center backed by President Donald Trump is set to vote Tuesday on a referendum that could reshape grassroots resistance to AI projects nationwide.

The vote in Port Washington, a lakeside town of roughly 12,000 people just north of Milwaukee, appears to be the first time any U.S. municipality will go to the ballot to kneecap data center development. It marks an aggressive new tactic in an escalating movement to oppose the hulking artificial intelligence factories — and offers a potential blueprint for other small towns challenging Big Tech.

Read more in Politico here.

This piece was initially published in The National Interest.

Granting small refinery exemptions would ease fuel costs and protect US refining capacity, preventing further price increases during the Iran War. 

The unprecedented supply disruption tied to the Strait of Hormuz has delivered the most severe energy shock in decades. The national average for a gallon of gas has surpassed $4 per gallon, the first time that’s happened in over four years. Drivers in some parts of the country are paying closer to $5 per gallon, and California is inching closer to $6. 

The economy or the climate? Why not both?

Subscribe for ideas that support the environment and the people. 

With seemingly no end to the Iran War in sight, the Trump administration has several actions to soften the economic blow, including waiving the Jones Act and releasing 172 million barrels of oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. One sensible solution to help consumers is to grant exemptions for the small refineries that are critical to US energy security and affordability. 

How the Renewable Fuel Standard Works 

Signed into law in 2005, the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) mandates that fuel suppliers blend renewable fuels into America’s gasoline supply. The most common fuel is corn-based ethanol, but other feedstocks can include soybeans, sugarcane, crop residues, and used cooking oil. Each year, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sets yearly targets for the biofuels market. 

Each refiner has a renewable volume obligation that requires a set percentage of the fuel they sell into the US market to include renewable fuels. That requirement can be met either by physically blending biofuels or by purchasing compliance credits. 

The Problems with the Renewable Fuel Standard

There have been several longstanding problems with the RFS, namely that it is an economic burden forced upon businesses and consumers through Soviet-style quotas. While ethanol is an important oxygenate to make gasoline burn cleaner, its use should be determined by market needs rather than government mandates.

Any other stated environmental benefits, however, are dubious at best. The RFS has led to land use changes and crop switching, increasing food prices for households. The land conversion and increased agricultural inputs are producing fuels that are no better, and sometimes worse, than gasoline from a climate perspective.

Why Small Refineries Are Disproportionately Affected by the Renewable Fuel Standard

For refiners, the cost of RFS compliance can be significant. For small and mid-sized refiners, compliance can be one of the most significant expenses. According to an August 2025 analysis by Turner, Mason, & Company, the mandate could cost refiners nearly $70 billion annually, nearly double what it cost refiners in 2023. Whether small or large, refiners must absorb the economic hit or pass costs onto consumers. 

Recognizing that one-size-fits-all mandates may be economically harmful, Congress created small refinery exemptions to prevent “disproportionate economic hardship.” Stripping away that relief now risks forcing refinery closures and making the pain at the pump even worse. There are roughly 50 small refineries in the United States, with 37 or so consistently engaged in the RFS exemption process.

Many of these small refineries are in rural communities and are the economic anchors of their towns. They help support entire local economies, funding schools, public safety, and infrastructure through their tax base. In many cases, they are the largest employer in town.

Together, they provide roughly 1.8 million barrels per day of US refining capacity. Supplying roughly 10 percent of America’s refining capacity, small refineries provide a meaningful share of the fuels Americans rely on every single day. Critically, these refiners often provide the specialized fuels necessary for our military, farmers, and manufacturers.

Higher Prices Are at Stake for Consumers and the Economy 

Denying small refiner exemptions would tighten fuel supply and drive prices even higher at a time when Americans are already feeling the squeeze. Gasoline prices have surged by nearly a dollar per gallon from a year ago. But the economic pain extends beyond the price at the pump. Higher fuel prices mean higher prices for groceries, travel, and all the goods that move by trucking, freight rail, shipping, and airlines. 

The United States cannot afford to lose refining capacity, especially in the middle of a seismic energy shock. Energy policy works best when it fosters competition and delivers for consumers. Biofuels work because they deliver value to consumers. If it’s cheaper and compatible with vehicles, consumers will choose it. Refiners and blenders will supply it. In fact, the small refinery exemptions during the first Trump administration did not destroy ethanol demand precisely because ethanol was economically competitive.

However, punishing small refineries would layer a bad decision on top of an antiquated, two-decade-old mandate that never should have existed in the first place. With gas prices where they are, denying small refinery exemptions would be remarkably bad timing. 

When Bob Hersey Jr., a Maine lobsterman, pulls up his traps, he gets more than tasty crustaceans. He’s collecting vital details about the changing ocean environment.

Mr. Hersey, who also dives for sea urchins, is among nearly 150 fishermen who have installed temperature sensors on their traps or trawl nets from Maine to North Carolina as part of a program run by a nonprofit organization with help from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

The soda-can-size sensors are dragged along the seafloor, giving fishermen and scientists a three-dimensional map of the ocean rather than just conditions on the surface, which can be checked using satellites or thermometers on boats. The data is continuously collected and fed into regional weather and climate models.

Read more in the New York Times here.

After 22 years at IBM, where he rose to senior vice president and director of IBM Research, Dr. Dario Gil now leads one of the most ambitious science and technology initiatives in a generation. As director of the Genesis Mission, Gil is orchestrating a convergence of high-performance computing, AI, and quantum computing aimed at fundamentally transforming how the nation does science and engineering.

As a guest on The POWER Podcast, Gil explained what the Genesis Mission is, how it works, and why its implications extend from fusion reactors to the Texas power grid. Here are the key takeaways.

Read more in Power Magazine here.

large data center

Data centers have become a boxy, hulking flashpoint heading into the midterms — and the backlash is spreading fast across red and blue states.

Why it matters: With no federal action, states are fielding constituent anger over power grids, water supplies and strained local infrastructure. But investment keeps accelerating; Wall Street isn’t slowing down, and neither is Washington’s appetite for AI dominance.

  • At least 11 states have proposed some legislation to restrict or ban data center development since late 2025.

Read more in Axios here.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) plans to propose to study microplastics and pharmaceuticals in what could be the first step toward drinking water limits for these substances.

The Trump administration is touting the move as a win for the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement, a subset of voters that is skeptical of the chemical and pharmaceutical industries — and has at times been critical of the Trump administration EPA.

Read more in The Hill here.

As the Iran war continues, oil prices keep rising. Gasoline has climbed to over $4 per gallon for the first time in four years. The ripple effects are spreading across the economy as markets that depend on affordable crude begin to absorb the disruption of roughly one-fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas that normally passes through the Strait of Hormuz. Everything from airline tickets to groceries is seeing upward pressure as the prices of jet fuel, diesel, and fertilizer all rise.

The economy or the climate? Why not both?

Subscribe for ideas that support the environment and the people. 

Politically, the longer this war continues, the worse the fallout will be for President Trump and his administration. The irony of gasoline politics is that, for all the public’s tendency to blame politicians for rising prices, presidents usually have little control over where fuel prices go. In this case, however, the connection is much clearer. Prices were relatively low before the war, and they have continued to rise since the conflict began.

After President Trump’s recent speech promising more aggressive strikes over the next two to three weeks, oil prices jumped immediately, underscoring that markets are pricing not just current disruption but the prospect of a longer war. There is also reason to believe that crude prices still may not fully reflect the scale of the shock. Refined fuels, including gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel, have risen faster than crude, suggesting that physical markets are already pricing in the disruption more fully than financial markets are. In effect, traders may still be holding out hope that the conflict will end quickly. If that hope fades, crude prices could rise further even without any new infrastructure damage or additional supply losses.

In fact, futures markets suggest that traders still expect the conflict to be relatively short-lived. Futures prices, which reflect what buyers and sellers expect oil to cost at a given point in the future, remain much closer to prewar levels over the medium and long term than today’s elevated prices. For example, oil for delivery in October, six months from now, is priced in the mid-$70s per barrel, while contracts for delivery a year from now are below $70. That suggests markets still expect prices to move back toward a level closer to their prewar level.

Ultimately, even if the war ended today, gasoline and other refined fuel prices would likely remain elevated for some time. Gasoline and oil prices are often subject to a pricing phenomenon known as “rockets and feathers.” Refined fuel prices are quick to shoot up in response to shocks in crude oil markets, but fall much more slowly once crude prices begin to decline. As a result, gasoline prices will likely take weeks or even months to reflect any meaningful decline in crude oil prices.

>>>READ: What Makes This Oil Shock Different

And the longer the war goes on, the greater the risk of lasting economic effects. As Philip Rossetti of the R Street Institute notes, the war could have lasting effects on prices due to both physical damage to energy infrastructure and heightened risk of future disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz. Even after a peace deal, markets may continue pricing in those risks if investors believe the Strait could again be used as a chokepoint in future conflicts. In other words, ending the war would not necessarily end the price shock. The damage already done, combined with the risk premium created by the conflict, could keep energy prices above prewar levels long after the fighting stops.

The broader lesson is that this war may not produce just a short-term increase in prices. By creating uncertainty, damaging infrastructure, and leaving behind risks that markets continue to price in, it could keep energy costs elevated long after the war ends.  The administration has already taken important steps to reduce Americans’ energy bills by addressing some of the government constraints that have contributed to higher energy prices, including efforts to repeal costly energy and environmental regulations, supporting opportunities for permitting reform, and seeking to remove barriers to domestic energy development. An immediate opportunity to build on those efforts is to secure a durable peace agreement and return to an energy affordability agenda.

large data center

Data centers are booming. As companies race to build the infrastructure behind artificial intelligence, communities across the country are sounding alarms about how much water these facilities consume. Some worry the massive complexes will strain water supplies that are already stretched thin.

The debate has quickly turned toward regulatory fixes, such as disclosure mandates, environmental reviews, and limits on how facilities operate. But the problem isn’t how much water data centers use—it’s how water gets allocated among competing demands. And as with any resource-allocation problem, the best answer isn’t mandates. It’s well-functioning markets.

Read more in Reason here.

This piece was initially published by the American Gas Association.

CERAWeek in Houston has become one of the most important annual convenings for energy providers, utilities, technology developers, policymakers, and investors.

The economy or the climate? Why not both?

Subscribe for ideas that support the environment and the people. 

The conversation at CERAWeek shifts each year. In 2026, the focus was on surging demand, disruptions to energy flows through the Strait of Hormuz, infrastructure bottlenecks, and a more pragmatic energy posture. The conference showed an industry and policymakers increasingly focused not on abstract narratives about the future of energy, but on the harder questions of security, buildout, reliability, affordability, and competitiveness.

In that context, natural gas was repeatedly framed as a U.S. strategic advantage, underscored by the fact that while international natural gas prices have spiked during the Strait disruption, U.S. domestic prices have barely moved.

From sessions on energy trade and infrastructure, AI demand growth and geopolitical security, industrial expansion, and consumer energy cost and deliverability challenges, I was struck by how many folks talked about natural gas as a durable and competitive asset for the United States and as a commercial strategy for companies.

Mike Wirth from Chevron said, “Gas is the foundation.”

David Lawler from Caturus added, “What we’re seeing, maybe, is just the very beginning of the role of natural gas, not only in America, but in the world.”

U.S. Secretary of Energy Chris Wright opened the conference with “Energy is life,” then quickly turned to natural gas. “America’s superpower is natural gas,” he said, pointing to its role in industry, heat, electricity, fertilizer, exports, and leading AI and manufacturing. He also highlighted the record performance of natural gas storage during Winter Storm Fern. His message was clear: pragmatism and resilience, and gas as essential infrastructure.

There was broad agreement that the U.S. is not short of resources. There was also agreement that the binding constraint is infrastructure buildout, especially permitting bottlenecks. And that reform is needed.

Chad Zamarin of Williams put it plainly: “Ten years ago, we were building three times the amount of electric transmission lines that we will build this year. Ten years ago, we were building three times the amount of pipeline capacity that we will this year, at a time when we need more than we’ve ever needed.”

>>>READ: From Net-Zero to Net-Abundance

Infrastructure lag also translates into affordability. Zoe Yujnovich of National Grid, discussing Fern and New York, said, “The cost of not having that [gas pipeline] capacity in the system does translate directly to affordability.”

Even the decarbonization discussion felt more pragmatic and infrastructure-focused. Wael Sawan from Shell said, “Our conviction is the mandate starts with the lights staying on, and energy bills coming down, and an increasingly decarbonized energy system,” and added that LNG is at “the heart of our strategy.”

Michele Harradence from Enbridge captured another thread on how new technology is integrated into work. AI will augment domain expertise, not replace it: “AI is not going to connect a meter, it’s not going to lay plastic pipe, and it’s not going to dig the hole. It’s going to maybe give us some ideas about how to do that better, but those folks who are doing that know how to do their work.”

My takeaway from CERAWeek 2026: the center of gravity is shifting toward execution and resilience. Industry strategy and policy priorities are being actively shaped by the realities of scale, timing, and infrastructure. The question is no longer what the energy system should look like. It’s whether we can build it fast enough. In that conversation, natural gas was not peripheral or temporary. It was foundational.

The State of Texas has opened applications for $350 million in advanced nuclear grants through the Texas Advanced Nuclear Development Fund (TANDF), making the nation’s largest state‑level nuclear package competitive for the first time across two programs aimed at reactor construction and supply chain development. In an exclusive interview with POWER, Texas Advanced Nuclear Energy Office (TANEO) Director Jarred Shaffer said notices of intent are due April 23, with full applications closing May 14.

Read more in Power Magazine here.

Subscribe to our exclusive email designed for conservatives who care about climate.

Help us promote free market solutions for climate change.

5 Incredible Ways Economic Freedom Helps the Planet.

Sign up for our newsletter now to get the full list right in your inbox.

Thank you for signing up

Help us promote sensible solutions for both planet and prosperity.

Download Now