Getting climate, energy & environment news right.

quotable climate

The Right Voices on Climate

Conservatives have been vocal about our climate for years. Those voices won’t be ignored any longer.

[searchandfilter id="17558"]

Pakistan will offer to buy more cotton and soybean from the US, according to people with knowledge of the matter, as it looks to halve its bilateral trade surplus and escape tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump.

The South Asian country wants to reduce this surplus to below $2 billion from about $4 billion in the financial year ended June, the people said, asking not to be identified as the discussions are private. Pakistan is already the second-largest buyer of US cotton by value after China and mainly sells garments and textiles to America, which is its largest export market.

Read more in Bloomberg here.

Researchers have devised and tested a way to mix old wind turbine blades with asphalt and cement concrete for more resilient road surfaces, expanding recycling options for the sector.

According to the Global Wind Energy Council, there were 117 gigawatts of wind power installations around the globe in 2023, which was a 50% increase over the previous year. To meet targets set at the 2023 United Nations Climate Change Conference, the world needs to increase that to 320 gigawatts by 2030.

However, since most wind turbines have a lifespan of around 20 years, we also need to find ways to deal with the growing waste as more get decommissioned.

The National Renewable Energy Laboratory estimated that 3,000 to 9,000 turbine blades will be retired each year for the next five years in the United States, according to a report by New Atlas. Luckily, the U.S. Department of Energy said the country has the infrastructure to process 90% of the mass in wind turbines.

Read more in Yahoo! Tech here.

gavin-newsom-energy-policy
The C3 Take
  • Innovation, Not Overregulation: Burdensome mandates like California’s cap-and-trade program stifle innovation by penalizing carbon use rather than rewarding clean-tech breakthroughs. True environmental progress comes from empowering entrepreneurs, not expanding government control.

  • Economic Freedom Drives Environmental Gains: As C3 Solutions has shown, countries and states with higher levels of economic freedom see better environmental outcomes. California’s heavy-handed approach undermines prosperity by deterring investment and placing a costly burden on innovators.

  • Economic Competitiveness: Ultimately, this policy harms California’s competitiveness, encourages entrepreneurs to simply move their operations to freer states (like Texas), and prevents the emergence of more effective, market-driven solutions for environmental challenges.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) and top state Democrats announced Tuesday they would seek an extension of the state’s cap-and-trade emissions reduction program — countering Trump administration efforts to thwart such initiatives.

Newsom — along with state Sen. Mike McGuire, the Senate president pro tempore, and Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas — made this decision following a recent federal executive order that called for the rollback of what President Trump described as local environmental “overreach.”

Read more in The Hill here.

Wild animals intermingle with domesticated animals more than you would think. In the American West, cows frequently share grazing land with one animal: elk. However, ranchers often hesitate to let elk graze the same land as their herds. Now, an innovative new agriculture trust is opening up grazing land and easing ranchers’ worries through the power of voluntary incentives. 

The economy or the climate? Why not both?

Subscribe for ideas that support the environment and the people. 

Dave Gottenborg is a Park County, Colorado, rancher who is passionate about helping wildlife. He brokered a first-of-its-kind agreement with the Property and Environment Research Center (PERC), a win for migrating elk and Gottenborg’s wallet. He’ll allow elk to migrate through the grazing lands he leases, and PERC will cover most of the associated costs. 

Gottenborg already loses money helping elk year-round. Every winter, he pulls down barbed wire fencing so that migrating elk can come onto his property without getting hurt. In the summers, he fixes fences that the elk destroyed while his cattle graze the land the elk have trampled. This situation benefits the elk, but Gottenborg takes a hit when, in his words, “500 elk show up and eat 20 pounds of forage per day, per elk.” 

>>>READ: What’s Going On With the Grizzly Bear Listing?

Grazing elk can eat up a lot of available food that might have otherwise gone to cattle. They may carry a bacterial disease called brucellosis that they can pass on to cows. If cows test positive for the disease, ranchers must initiate a lengthy quarantine and testing protocol, which takes time and money, adding extra motivation to keep the two species apart in the first place. 

But elk need access to grazing land, even if it’s land occupied by herds of cattle. To ease the financial pressure on Gottenborg and demonstrate to other ranchers that incentives can work, PERC has committed to paying more than two-thirds of Gottenborg’s grazing land lease rate. They have agreed to do so for five years, as long as the land outlined in the agreement remains available to grazing elk. 

“We agreed to keep the payment less than 100% so it would still be more profitable for third-party landowners to keep agricultural grazing usage,” Gottenborg explained. The concern is that people who lease land to ranchers may stop leasing and simply collect money to host the elk if given the option. If that were to happen, Gottenborg says that would hurt area ranchers. “Devastate us, really.”

The Colorado Cattlemen’s Agricultural Land Trust helped broker the deal and will monitor elk herds on Gottenborg’s property. They will serve as an outside organization holding Gottenborg accountable and keeping an eye on things using trail cameras, drones, and in-person visits. Gottenborg will not be laying out salt or minerals for elk, but his pasture leases will be open to allow migrating animals to stop and eat for as long as they want. 

Gottenborg’s agreement with PERC is an excellent example of private actors at work to solve a wildlife management problem using ingenuity and incentives. Hopefully, we will see many more of these agreements pop up wherever needed. 

The Trump administration canceled a $3.1 billion grant program for climate-friendly crops, the Agriculture Department announced Monday. 

In a press release, the department said that it was canceling Biden-era Partnerships for Climate-Smart Commodities, which funded 141 projects that sought to advance climate-friendly farming practices.

Projects funded under the program supported things like planting cover crops, which prevent soil erosion, and managing soil nutrients to minimize farming’s environmental impacts. 

The Biden administration estimated that the program would reach more than 60,000 farms and cut more than 60 million metric tons of carbon dioxide — the equivalent of taking 12 million gas-powered cars off the road for a year.

Read more in The Hill here.

Pakistan is considering importing crude oil from the United States for the first time to offset a trade imbalance that triggered higher U.S. tariffs, according to a government source directly involved with the proposal and a refinery executive.

Countries are scrambling to find ways to lower their U.S. tariff burdens, including buying more U.S. oil and gas, as President Donald Trump’s sweeping import duties rattle economies and markets.

“It is one of the products being reviewed ahead of a delegation leaving for the U.S. to talk about tariffs,” said a government source directly involved with the proposal to the prime minister to buy more U.S. crude.

“It is under active consideration. We are exploring opportunities and the structure to do it, but the PM has to approve it,” he said.

Read more in Reuters here.

We’re in an era where organizations, now more than ever, are focused on the resilience of their business. With the resurgence of manufacturing in the US, companies are turning to diversification and truly embracing the idea of reindustrialization.

Hurdles such as geopolitical risks, potential supply chain disruptions, and economic uncertainty have companies leaning even further into capitalizing on the critical role digital transformation and sustainability will play in this next wave of industrial competition.

Read more in E+E Leader here.

Our food system is under pressure. Water shortages, soil degradation, a changing climate, and a growing global population make it harder to grow enough food using traditional methods. At the same time, cities are expanding, and development is replacing farmland. One solution to meet our nutrition needs while addressing these challenges is controlled environment agriculture.

The economy or the climate? Why not both?

Subscribe for ideas that support the environment and the people. 

Controlled environment agriculture, or CEA, is a method of growing food indoors under carefully managed conditions. These conditions can include temperature, light, humidity, and even the nutrients plants receive. CEA differs from traditional farming, which depends on outdoor weather and seasons. With CEA, farmers can grow food all year round, no matter what’s happening outside.

One of the most significant advantages of this method is that it removes the risks connected to unpredictable weather. Droughts, floods, heat waves, and frosts can destroy outdoor crops. But in a controlled environment, those risks disappear. Farmers can grow reliable harvests every season, which is a huge benefit when unpredictable and severe weather events harm farming and ranching activities. Another key advantage is its efficient use of space

Traditional farms require large land areas to grow crops, whereas in CEA, particularly vertical farming, plants are stacked in layers, enabling a significantly higher yield in a smaller space. This is especially useful in cities, where land is expensive and limited. Instead of transporting food from far away, urban farms can grow it near where people live. That also means fresher food and fewer emissions from transportation.

Controlled environment agriculture also uses much less water. In some systems, water is recycled through closed loops, which means almost none is wasted. This is a considerable improvement compared to regular farming, which uses massive amounts of water, especially for crops like rice or almonds. Since many regions globally face water shortages, conserving water is critically important.

>>>READ: Controlled Environment Agriculture Can Revolutionize Specialty Farming

Another reason this method is appealing is because it reduces the need for crop protection chemicals. Since the environment is closed and controlled, fewer pests and diseases exist. Fewer pesticides and herbicides are needed, which is better for both the environment and the people eating the food.

And then there’s freshness. Because food grown in controlled environments can be placed close to where people buy and eat it, it doesn’t have to travel as far. That means it can be harvested at its ripest and eaten while still fresh and full of nutrients. In contrast, food grown far away often must be picked early and shipped long distances, reducing quality and increasing pollution.

Controlled environment agriculture also creates new job opportunities. It’s not just about planting seeds and watering crops—it involves using technology, data, and careful planning to optimize production. Modern agriculture, including traditional farming, already relies heavily on these tools. This shift opens up new roles for people with expertise in science, engineering, and digital tools, offering a chance to create innovative careers in agriculture that didn’t exist before.

Of course, this approach isn’t perfect. It can be expensive to build and maintain the systems needed for CEA. Electricity is required for lighting and climate control, leading to higher emissions associated with crop production—especially if the energy is not from renewable sources. Also, not every kind of crop is suited to this method. Leafy greens and herbs work well, but it’s harder to grow grains like wheat or corn in these environments—at least for now.

Still, the potential is exciting. Controlled environment agriculture won’t replace all traditional farming, but it can help create a more resilient and sustainable food system. It can also help ensure that cities have access to fresh, local food. As technology improves, it may become more affordable and widely used around the world.

If we want to feed future generations and minimize our environmental impact, we must rethink how we grow food. Controlled environment agriculture gives us a way forward. It’s smart, clean, and reliable—and it’s already starting to change the world.

The Department of Energy wants to hear from developers interested in building data centers and artificial intelligence infrastructure at 16 sites nationwide, one of them in Richland.

DOE issued a “request for information” last week to assess industry interest and gather information on potential technology and economic considerations. It also wants information on locating new nuclear and other energy generation facilities with the data centers.

Under DOE’s ideal timeline, infrastructure construction for artificial intelligence data centers would start by the end of this year, with operations to start in 2027.

The project is being launched to ensure American leadership in artificial intelligence, said Michael Kratsios, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy.

Read more in Tri-City Herald here

In less than a year, Base Power has grown from a stealthy startup to one of the largest battery fleets in Texas.

Now the company has raised $200 million to fund a rapid expansion, including dozens more megawatt-hours of battery storage and plans for a domestic battery factory.

The Series B round was led by Addition, Andreessen Horowitz, Lightspeed Venture Partners, and Valor Equity Partners. Altimeter, Terrain, Thrive Ventures, and Trust Ventures participated.

Read more in TechCrunch here.

Copyright © 2020 Conservative Coalition for Climate Solutions