Communities and innovators are advocating for clean energy not just to protect the environment but also to empower local populations to manage their needs for affordable, reliable energy. This approach fosters job creation and enhances resilience against power outages and natural disasters. Across the nation, neighborhoods are taking initiative with projects such as solar co-ops and local energy grids. These initiatives cut down on emissions and empower individuals to influence their energy future.
Community-driven clean energy projects often address local problems more effectively than big corporations or governments can. In Taos, New Mexico, Kit Carson Electric Cooperative improved an unreliable power supply by installing microgrid-small-scale, self-sufficient power grids that generate electricity for a localized area. This system provides steady electricity today, with a concomitant decrease in emissions.
Another great example is solar co-ops. These allow neighbors to join together and share the cost of solar panels. By pooling their money, they make solar energy affordable for everyone involved. This isn’t just about saving on electricity bills. It’s about empowering people to create clean energy and reduce dependence on big utilities.
>>>READ: Low-energy Britain is stuck in a rut
These projects also create jobs and bolster economic growth in local communities. According to the Solar Energy Industries Association, community solar programs have created thousands of jobs and injected billions into local economies. When communities invest in solar or wind energy, they need workers to install and maintain these systems. They also support local businesses, like electricians and contractors, who provide essential services.
Brooklyn’s microgrid project, a community-driven initiative that began in the Park Slope and Gowanus communities in the spring of 2016, shows how local energy systems can do more than just supply power. Using new technology, like blockchain, lets neighbors trade electricity. If one household generates extra solar power, it can sell it to another. The mini-energy market empowers people to save money and keep resources within the community.
Of course, some people say small-scale projects cannot effectively reduce emissions. They are wrong. These efforts collectively add up and could drive down the costs of innovative technologies.
A frequent concern is the cost. Many believe that clean energy is too pricey for small communities. However, this is no longer the case. The prices of solar panels and batteries have significantly decreased in recent years. Rather than use targeted tax credits for specific technologies, tax policies like immediate expensing could help offset the cost of new energy infrastructure. Private-sector-driven solutions are often more sustainable as they align market forces with community needs.
>>>READ: The Energy and Climate Leadership We Need
These community initiatives demonstrate how free-market principles can address significant challenges—allowing communities to experiment and discover what works best fosters innovation and competition. Companies are also stepping up by providing tools like solar leases, which enhance access to clean energy. Collaboration between communities and businesses accelerates the expansion of clean energy and makes it more effective.
Policymakers can establish programs that incentivize local projects by reducing bureaucratic obstacles. Businesses can collaborate with neighborhoods to share their knowledge and resources. Individuals can engage by joining or initiating clean energy projects in their communities.
The clean energy movement goes beyond technology and policies; it’s fundamentally about people. When communities unite to create solar co-ops or microgrids, they not only reduce emissions but also foster stronger, more self-sufficient neighborhoods. They are paving the way for a future that benefits everyone. We can improve lives and effectively implement energy and climate policies by prioritizing people who want affordable, secure, and cleaner energy.
The views and opinions expressed are those of the author’s and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of C3.
